Why is having empathy important as a peer reviewer? a. to give you the chance to review the information before you read the essay b. to you offer constructive comments rather than unintentionally hurtful ones c. to make it easier to suggest sentence-level corrections to your peers d. to provide you with ideas on how to structure your own research essay

The correct answer is B. To help you offer constructive comments rather than unintentionally hurtful ones.

Explanation:

The word empathy refers to the ability to place oneself in someone else position, this means empathy is about understanding the motivation, feelings, and situation of another person, which leads to an emotional understanding and care of other people. In the case of peer review which is a type of review in which students or peers check and evaluate each other's work such as texts or presentations, empathy is an important element. This can be explained as placing in the other's position help you to understand why he or she decided to include certain elements or complete the task assigned in a certain way, also, by being empathetic you will be aware of the emotions of the other and the effort they put on the work evaluated even if it has mistakes or things they should improve. In this way, by knowing the other's feelings, effort and position your comment would be positive or constructive and will help your peer to improve the work rather than making your peer feel bad with destructive or hurtful comments.

the price of our current war is high; it costs money and it costs lives.

but it does not cost our pride. it does not cost the guilt that would arise from knowing that we did nothing to intervene while our neighboring nations fell to despotic leaders.

it does not cost the terror of knowing that our allies are unstable. it does not cost the fear that we, too, will be next to fall.

which sentence most accurately explains why the speaker's use of the parallel structure is effective in this passage?

a. it underscores that disagreement will not be tolerated and will be dealt with swiftly.

b. it makes the speaker seem like a decisive and capable leader.

c. it emphasizes reasons to fight and inspires listeners to aid the war effort.

d. it establishes the speaker's credibility by acknowledging the difficulties of war.

the correct answer is "dissent"

explanation:

because dissent is when one or more judges express disagreement with the majority in court, in specific legal systems.   an   argument in opposition is presented to the court, with a different interpretation, or application.