From the following quote, decide whether the statement is more progressive or traditional. there is no 'essence' of literature whatsoever . . any writing may be read 'poetically'. if i pore over the railway timetable not to discover a train connection but to stimulate in myself general reflections on the speed and complexity of modern existence, then i might be said to be reading it as literature. (terry eagleton) traditional progressive

Progressive

Explanation:

This is a clearly progressive statement because it departs significantly from traditional notions, i.e., conceptions established  at a previous time that persist historically through repetition, in this case, about what makes a piece of writing count as literature. The author rejects the traditional and broadly accepted idea that there is an intrinsic essence to literary texts that differentiate them from non-literary texts.

the answer is both an appeal to ethos and logos (if that's what your question options were)