What best describes the difference in style between the declaration of independence and the bill of rights? select all that apply. the declaration was written without the of a committee of style. the declaration was intended for a wide audience and is written in a more powerful, persuasive style. the bill of rights was intended as a legal document while the declaration carried no legal significance. the bill of rights was intended for delegates and lawmakers and is written in a more precise, technical style.

  ! i need it ! the daughters of the revolution eventually admitted african american to their hall.which best analyzes how this detail supports the meaning in "marian anderson sings"? a)it shows that african american performers would never be able to perform in some theaters. b)its show that an era of discrimination on unfair treatment of african american was finally over. c)it shows that marian anderson had ease discrimination for for african american performers. d)its shows that revolutionaries are not open to new ideas.

Fill in the table with definitions of the literary techniques and concepts that occur in beowulf.

Read the passage from a vindication of the rights of woman. that the society is formed in the wisest manner, whose constitution is founded on the nature of man, strikes, in the abstract, every thinking being so forcibly, that it looks like presumption to endeavour to bring forward proofs; though proof must be brought, or the strong hold of prescription will never be forced by reason; yet to urge prescription as an argument to justify the depriving men (or women) of their natural rights, is one of the absurd sophisms which daily insult common sense. does wollstonecraft maintain an objective tone in the passage? yes, because she uses objective language such as “society is formed in the wisest manner.” yes, because she uses objective language such as “it looks like presumption to endeavor.” no, because she uses subjective language such as “though proof must be brought, or the strong hold.” no, because she uses subjective language such as “absurd sophisms which daily insult common sense.”