subject
English, 30.07.2019 11:30 pumaben2864

Question: what is the most likely reason why the movie director left out this part of the novel? novel: there was an old door in this playground, on which the boys had a custom of carving their names. it was completely covered with such inscriptions. in my dread of the end of the vacation and their coming back, i could not read a boy's name, without inquiring in what tone and with what emphasis he would read, 'take care of him. he bites.' there was one boy - a certain j. steerforth - who cut his name very deep and very often, who, i conceived, would read it in a rather strong voice, and afterwards pull my hair. there was another boy, one tommy traddles, who i dreaded would make game of it, and pretend to be dreadfully frightened of me. answer choices: a. because cutting this part limit the movie to a reasonable length. b. because david's fears were not important to the story. c. because there was no action or dialogue in this part. d. because it would not be possible to show on film what david was imagining.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 13:30
Synthesizing new ideas from a speaker with what one already knows about the subject to see if the information makes sense is an example of a) questioning and challenging b) identifying differences c) forming a statement d) seeing the broader context
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 04:30
Write a review of the first part of american born chinese that explains your opinion on the effectiveness of two different plot elements
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 07:50
She took up a scalpel and slit the monkey's abdomen, making a slow and gentle cut, keeping the blade well away from her gloved fingers. the spleen was puffed up and tough, leathery, like a globe of smoked salami. she did not see any bloody lesions inside this monkey. she had expected that the monkey's interior would be a lake of blood, but no, this monkey looked all right, it had not bled into itself. if the animal had died of ebola, this was not a clear case. she opened up the intestine. there was no blood inside it. the gut looked okay. then she examined the stomach. there she found a ring of bleeding spots at the junction between the stomach and the small intestine. this could be a sign of ebola, but it was not a clear sign. it could also be a sign of simian fever, not ebola. therefore, she could not confirm the presence of ebola virus in this animal based on a visual inspection of the internal organs during necropsy.
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 08:30
What can be inferred by the description of this setting
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Question: what is the most likely reason why the movie director left out this part of the novel? n...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722362