Is it fair for the industrialized nation to expect that all nations, including the less developed ones, restrict there use of fossil fuels and therefore participate in future disadvantages without obtaining the benefits of cheap energy or do you think the industrialized nations which have enjoyed the past benefits, should accept most of the future cost

Answer and Explanation:

As an issue of equity of individual and nation legal. Everyone is similarly from this point of view created nations or industrialized nations which have just utilized such an extensive amount petroleum product and contribute parcel to carbon discharges and environmental change ought to need to quit utilizing those oil diesel coal and so on stuffs, rather then less created nations who haven't get an opportunity to utilize them and now individuals of those nations could be profited around business sectors of these stuffs.

It's just a question of rich and poor nations so according to the matter of equity poor and undeveloped nations should likewise given possibility. Also, ought to be dealt with similarly.  

On other hand rich and create nations ought to be prohibited on utilizing these petroleum products according to natural concerns. Cash doesn't give a rich individual or nation ideal to decimate and hurt condition for claim benefits.  

Hence it's absolutely unfair for the industrialized country to anticipate that all countries, including the less created ones, confine there utilization of petroleum derivatives and along these lines take an interest in future detriments without acquiring the advantages of modest vitality rather the industrialized countries which have delighted in the past advantages, ought to acknowledge a large portion of things to come cost or quit utilizing them.

the answer is the last option or letter d)

's the question?