2) what are some of the concepts about human nature and the relationship between humans and nature that had to change before an evolutionary concept could develop?

6) many anti-evolutionists believe that since science doesn't have answers for all questions; scientific conclusions are not necessarily correct. this attitude reflects a failure to understand the nature of science. what is the general nature of scientific thinking? in what way is science "self correcting"?

Answer and Explanation:

2. So as to build up a developmental idea, human instinct needs to change and people need to comprehend that solid human connection with nature is the only method for evolution for both nature as well as humans.  

On the off chance that people start treating nature well, at that point will confront outrageous states of nature less and that would enable them to evolve.

Otherwise, on the off chance that the human instinct relationship gets irritated because of human instinct, at that point not just nature and human both won't include yet additionally both will head towards termination gradually some way or another and will be treading the path that will eventually lead to the finish of time for both human and nature.  

6. The general idea of logical reasoning essentially chips away at the idea of speculations, theory, and above all verification, without a doubt science neglects to clarify certain things which they are attempting to demonstrate however are not able to demonstrate or prove, so where there is a triumph, disappointments function as stair for the improvement and answer to everything can never be as per the expectations.

All things are considered on the ground that there are ideas or concepts past learning of people till date yet science is never ending.  

Science is self-redressing as regardless of whether it neglects to accomplish something it never quits.

Science never stops regardless of whether there was a slip-up in the wake of difficulty a few times the mix-up is naturally rectified.