What are the matters considered in order to establish federal structure in Nepal

Explanation:

Where there already is a single nation (like France or Norway for two examples) there is no need for a federal system. It is only in nation-states that have a long history of local independent states (like the German principalities that had been largely independent from medieval times until the mid 19th century) or the United States if you count the 150+ years of our colonial era) that you find the need for such a system.

to phrase it more universally, federal government structures are needed when there are many competing local sovereign powers and you need to get them all working together in a system that is more unified than a confederacy but those local sovereigns are not willing to give up enough power to be forged into a single nation. Such a system may be necessary in cases of intense tribal animosities (like Iraq and Afghanistan) or where centralized power is an alien overlay (like India where the central government was imposed by the British) but absent factors like that I can not image why someone would want a federal system.

If Nepal falls under one of these scenarios, then the things to be considered are what powers need to be left at the national level - usually international issues and many economic issues - and which can be transferred to the local level - mostly tort, contract, criminal, and social issues. When can / should the national government be able to override the local governments and when can / should the local governments be able to tell the national government to butt out? How do you adjudicate those disputes?

Let me suggest that one read up on the origins of the different federalized systems throughout history and then come up with a specific list based on the realities in Nepal today. Then start building political alliances necessary to push through the changes - and if you have less than 70% public support (not merely apathy but active support)

hola:

ef0: daños leves. algunas tejas caídas y otras pequeñas piezas de los tejados arrancadas, algunos daños en canaletas, ramas de árboles rotas y algunos árboles poco profundos arrancados. los tornados que no causan daños visibles (por ejemplo aquellos que se producen en campos abiertos) se valoran siempre como de ef0.

ef1: daños moderados. tejados seriamente despedazados, caravanas y casetas volcadas o seriamente dañadas, perdida de puertas exteriores y ventanas y otros cristales rotos.

ef5: daños increíbles. las casas fuertes pueden quedar arrasadas hasta los cimientos, las estructuras de hormigón armado dañadas críticamente, los edificios altos sufren graves deformaciones estructurales. devastaciones increíbles.

y según esto creo que puedes sacar tus conclusiones. y la verdad la escala ef10 si no se decirte por que no la eh visto o mejor dicho estudiado. espero que te sirva. suerte.