subject
Health, 01.10.2019 01:00 sassyparker1216

Consider the reasoning expressed by the speaker in this passage: "we were having a severe midwinter cold spell. the city was running out of heating oil for private home use. so the city ordered everyone to set their home thermostats down to 65 degrees fahrenheit during the day and 62 at night. but i set my thermostat at 67 during the day and 64 at night. i reasoned this way. it is in my best interest to cheat just a little by keeping our house a bit warmer. in fact, it is in the best interest of each person who lives in the city to do the same thing. so it follows that it is in the city's best interest if everyone were to cheat just a little." we can reasonably evaluate the speaker's inference as
(a) valid because of affirming the antecedent
(b) valid because of disjunctive syllogism (c) a fallacy of false classification (d) a fallacy of false reference (e) a fallacy of composition

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Health

question
Health, 22.06.2019 06:30
Can you tell the size of a woman's coxal bone by observation?
Answers: 1
question
Health, 22.06.2019 18:50
Which of these is a controllable risk fator for disease
Answers: 2
question
Health, 23.06.2019 15:30
First to answer will be the brainliest i need the answer asap
Answers: 2
question
Health, 23.06.2019 19:00
The post exposure exam follow up must include counseling about the possible implications of the exposure and your infection status including the results and interpretation of all tests and how to protect personal contacts. the follow up must also include evaluation of reported illnesses that may be related to the exposure. what apse should you be provided with?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Consider the reasoning expressed by the speaker in this passage: "we were having a severe midwinter...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722360