During a pick-up basketball game in the neighborhood park, two players were running up the court, when Jeff, a 16-year-old ran into Paul, a 17-year-old, and they both fell to the ground. Paul complains that his ankle is in a lot of pain and he says it hurts to move it. Jeff has sharp pain in his right shoulder. What do you do?

Injuries in the environment are a result of a. lower level activities. b. irresponsibility. c. mismatch between a child's abilities and activities. d. children not paying attention.

Carissa, age 14, having trouble keeping up with all her assignments and when they are due. in addition to that, she struggles to balance school work, chores at home, social life, and playing volleyball. question 1 options: underdeveloped frontal lobe underdeveloped amygdala underdeveloped cerebellum underdeveloped corpus callosum question 2 (5 points) teens are not as adept at interpreting facial expressions and emotions as adults. what is the reason for this? question 2 options: teens use the frontal lobe more than adults which interferes with the use of the other areas of the brain like the amygdala. teens use the amygdala and adults use the frontal lobe to differentiate between similar facial expressions and emotions. adults have a thicker corpus callosum than teens which allows them to use both sides of their brain more efficiently. the lymbic regions of the brain are used more in adulthood than adolescence. question 3 (5 points) the human brain's development is like pruning a tree. as one grows older the unused connections in the brain are removed to make room for new growth. question 3 options: true false question 4 (5 points) michael, age 16, driving his car fast down a curvy road without his headlights on. question 4 options: underdeveloped amygdala underdeveloped cerebellum underdeveloped frontal lobe underdeveloped corpus callosum

Hi i need comment on my homework or something to add. *argue for and against quantitative and qualitative techniques respectively. which ones would you lean towards when conducting an investigation and why?   quantitative techniques, usually presented through surveys, are more practical, take less time, and can design samples in which any person or household of the target audience has the same probability of participating. however, the questionnaires must be carefully written by highly trained professionals, in such a way that they do not contain ambiguous or biased questions, that they are easily understandable by any member of the sample, and that they contemplate all the objectives of the research. besides that they do not allow to deepen in the reason of the facts. qualitative techniques, on the other hand, are based on the observation of natural behaviors, discourses, open responses for the subsequent interpretation of meanings. studying reality in its natural context can be extremely useful to learn more about the phenomenon studied. however, more specialization is required, they are not applicable to statistics, so it is not possible to make measurements, it entails a higher cost per studied population (which is also reduced), whose results do not necessarily represent the general population. i believe that knowing the situation of the general population, through statistics is essential. in addition, because of the possibility of studying a much larger population in less time and with less amount of economic resources, i would lean towards quantitative research.