Describe how a researcher might use naturalistic observation, case studies, and survey research to investigate gender differences in aggressive behavior at the workplace? first state a hypothesis and then describe your research approaches. what positive and negative features does each method have?

To discover whether gender has anything to do with aggression in the work place we have to have access to any filed complaints in many of the similar work conditions, and then tally the number of male and female individuals that were part of the disputes. After coming up with two rows of statistics for numerous workers over a long period comparison of stats would prove that one or the other would be more likely to act aggressive in that tested work environment. 

If you were going to do this experiment with an independent variable, instead of computing the data, you are going to have to set up women on one side and men on the other <CV, and see how they handle an imposed stimulus for frustration <IV.

20 times a minute is usually the average respritory rate of an adult. additionally the patient is breathing on his own, is clearly maintaining his airway, and is intaking a sufficient amount of air. you shouldn't use a bag valve mask, cpap, or other form of positive pressure ventilation, unless the patient has lost control of his airway, and is not breathing (apneic) or has rapid breathing or slow and shallow respirations. this patient would most likely and should be put on an non-rebreather mask or nrb attached to 100% high flow oxygen at 15 l/min. don't use a nasal cannula, as the amount of oxygen it provides is limited with a rate of 6 l/min.