How does king respond to those who counsel the movement to pursue "a policy of moderation"?

During the 50s Martin Luther King Jr. was a fierce advocate for the rights of African Americans.

Rights which many believed were denied to them even after the tragic civil war an the poor reconstruction era.

In a response to a call for 'a policy of moderation' Marin Luther King Jr. said that if moderation meant that we should move forward with calm, restraint, non violence and reason, then he was all for a moderation.

However, if moderation meant that they should slow done their movement for justice, equality, rights and freedom of African Americans, then he could not accept a policy of moderation.

At the end, Martin Luther King Jr. believed in the right to ask for justice but without violence and restraint.

The president of the united states does not have the authority to “limit” the power of the judicial branch. however, the president can influence the political direction of decisions made by justices on the supreme court through the nomination process when a position becomes available.i would say the best answer is that he can at least interpret the laws