What idea was the decision in griswold v. connecticut based upon? if the constitution forbids self-incrimination, husbands and wives should not be forced to testify against each other. the constitution cannot possibly include all rights, so judges can create new ones based on what the founders must have been thinking. if the constitution forbids unreasonable searches, there must be a reasonable right to privacy. the constitution does not meet everyone’s needs, so citizens can disregard laws when they think the government is violating their rights.

Answer;

C. The Constitution forbids unreasonable search and seizure.

Explanation;

-Griswold v. Connecticut represents a landmark case in the history of United States. It was about an individual’s access to contraception. The case dealt with a Connecticut law prohibiting people from the use of; any drug, medicinal article, or instrument for the purpose of prevention of contraception.

-The Supreme Court ruled that a state's ban on the use of contraceptives violated the right to marital privacy. The case concerned a Connecticut law that criminalized the encouragement or use of birth control.

answer: what was the us involvement in ww1? although the u.s. tried to remain neutral when ww1 broke out, it finally joined on april 6, 1917 after declaring war on germany. the reason for america to become involved in ww1 was germany's unrestricted submarine warfare, which had already sunk several american merchant ships.

explanation:

nativists tried to get rid of the immigrants as they thought they were going to ruin the u.s.