Some historians argue that the french revolution was more liberating than the american revolution. what might be the basis for this argument? more people died in the american revolution. the american revolution was more of an international effort. slaves, in france, were granted limited citizenship following the french revolution. women in america had fewer rights than french women after the revolution.

The correct answer to this question is D) women in America had fewer rights than French women after the revolution.

The basis of the argument might be that women in America had fewer rights than French women after the revolution.

Some historians argue that the French Revolution was more liberating than the American Revolution. Some historians consider that this might have happened because the Revolution in America was more political than the French Revolution that had more freedom purposes. This means that the American Revolution had political issues as well as independent issues. The French Revolution practically was the people´s demand for freedom and justice.

The American Revolution was the consequence of the anger of colonist after the Stamp Act and the heavy taxation imposed by the British. Meanwhile, the French Revolution was one of the most important events that impacted many other nations. That movement was the result of the precarious conditions French people lived at the time. They were fighting for freedom, equity, and fraternity.

on my last question

islamic religious leaders have traditionally been people who, as part of the clerisy, mosque, or government, performed a prominent role within their community or nation. however, in the modern contexts of muslims minorities in non-muslim countries as well as secularised muslim states like turkey, indonesia and bangladesh, religious leadership may take a variety of non-formal shapes.

compared to religious leaders/clerics of the other abrahamic faiths, islamic clergy are said to resemble rabbis and not priests. unlike catholic priests they do not "serve as intermediaries between mankind and god",[1] have "process of ordination",[2] or "sacramental functions",[1] but instead serve as "exemplars, teachers, judges, and community leaders," providing religious rules to the pious on "even the most minor and private" matters.[1]