In what part of the great compromise are the ideas of the virginia plan represented? the senate the house of representatives the office of the president the unicameral legislature

In the Great Compromise, the ideas of the Virginia Plan are represented in the House of Representatives.

In 1787, the various representatives of the American states met in Philadelphia to write together the first constitution of the United States. Before that, since 1781, they were governed by the articles of the confederation which gave them great freedom and created a national government with very weak powers. This system didn't work and had led the country into an economic and social crisis. The main disagreement between the representatives during the Philadelphia debates was about state representation. Finally, the text accepted by all and called the great compromise or compromise of Connecticut.

Before the signing of the compromise, there were two opposing sides:

Major states wanted the elected representatives in the chamber to be proportional to the number of voters in each state, which would automatically give them more elected representatives. Small states, on the contrary, wanted to create a single chamber where each state, regardless of its size, would have the same number of representatives. It was necessary to find a compromise between these two opposite propositions, and it was Connecticut that succeeded to do it.

The adopted text created two chambers: the House of Representatives where the elected officials were proportional to the size of their states, as Virginia wanted, and the Senate where each state had the same number of representatives, as the New Jersey wanted.

Subject: History

Chapter: The US Constitution

Keywords: Virginia plan, New Jersey plan, the first constitution of the United States, the election of the house of representatives in the US

The House of Representatives part of the Great Compromise represents the ideas of the Virginia Plan.  

Further Explanation:

The Virginia Plan or Randolph Plan introduced by theVirginian delegates was proposing for a “bicameral legislative branch”. It was drafted by John Madison to get introduced in the Constitutional Convention of 1787 aiming at setting up agendas for the discussion emphasizing the idea of populace weighted representation. The delegates framed a discussion to be proposed in the convention drafted byJames Madison. Edmund Randolph, the Virginian Governor introduced it on 29th May 1787 in the arrangement of 15 resolutions.

The Great compromise of 1787, a multi delegate plan aimed at unifying the states through a constitutional convention. The foremost objective of the covenant was to replace the “Article of Confederation” and establish a new bicameral structured administration providing equality in representation to all the States. The framing and structure of The House of Representative part of the Great Compromise represented the ideas of the Virginia plan.  

Learn More

1. In a parliamentary system of representative democracy, the prime minister is appointed by the monarch. is elected by representatives chosen by the people. is the leader of the party that won the most seats in parliament. is elected directly by the people?link

2. starting in the1800s, members of the suffragist movement in the united states focused on women's right to?

link

3. Which of the following best describes the Ottoman Empire in the years just before World War I?

link

Answer Details:

Grade: High school

Subject: US History  

Chapter: Great compromise

Keywords: Philadelphia,Virginia Plan, Randolph Plan, Virginian, delegates, bicameral legislative branch, John Madison, Constitutional Convention, Edmund Randolph, Virginian Governor,Great compromise,

b) a state law could be declared illegal if it contradicted the constitution.

explanation:

the conflict of this case originated when james w. mcculloch, a cashier of the baltimore branch of the second bank of the united states that the congress had chartered in 1816, refused to pay a tax imposed by the maryland state.

in the case, the state of maryland appealed that the establishment of a second bank was unconstitutional since the constitution didn't say anything about granting that power to congress. however, the case determined that even if such right wasn't specifically stated in the constitution, it was part of the "implied powers" of the government enunciated in article i, section 8.

the case also eliminated maryland's legislation to impose taxes to a national bank, asserting that even though the states retained the power of taxation, the constitution's laws are supreme and can not be controlled by the states, therefore, if a state law contradicts the constitution, it should be declared illegal.

explanation:

the answer is the government.