Which of the following had some power to limit the authority of the monarch in pre-columbian mexican civilization? a. the judicial tribunal b. the city legislature c. the people d. the despot

This is a tricky question, because there was no judicial tribunal or city legislature in pre-Columbian Mexican civilization. The despot would be the monarch became autoritharistic. So I would say the people had some power to limit the authority of the monarch. I don't remember of any case in which the revolt of the people overthrow the tlatoani, the Aztec authority, but they did betray tlatoani Moctezuma, joined the Spanish conquerors and defeated the Aztec empire.

The answer is option A.

Explanation:

This is a precarious inquiry, on the grounds that there was no legal council or city lawmaking body in pre-Columbian Mexican progress. The tyrant would be the ruler progressed toward becoming autoritharistic. So I would state the general population had some capacity to confine the expert of the ruler. I don't recollect of any case in which the revolt of the general population oust the tlatoani, the Aztec specialist, yet they betrayed tlatoani Moctezuma, joined the Spanish victors and crushed the Aztec domain.

is this a question? put a question ?

it proved indian land claims were unjustified.