What was the balance between corruption and positive accomplishment by the reconstruction-era state governments in the south? positive → public education system and work programs; 20 blacks serve in us hor between 1869-1901 corruption → segregation in schools and freedmen's bureau took back the land from the blacks and gave it back to the whites; whites unhappy and no black man ever elected governor in southern states between 1869-1901?

The balance between corruption and positive accomplishment by the Reconstruction-era state governments in the South is shown below:

For the positive side: there were public education system and work programs. While 20 black people served in the US HOR between 1869 and 1901.

For the corruption side: there were race segregation in school, and Freedmen’s Bureau took back the lands from the blacks and gave it to the whites. No black man was elected governor in the Southern states between 1869 and 1901.

congress failed to remove johnson. but it did succeed in getting control of efforts to re-build the south following america's civil war. radical republicans wanted to punish the south for starting the war. they also wanted to be sure new governments in the southern states would support the republican party.

yes i think there would be volunteers