Ihave 4 extended response history questions i need answered asap and you. : )
1. what powers did the rowlatt bills give to the british government?
2. why were the indians so upset about the passage of this bill.
3. what is the difference between satyagraha and hartal?
4. how do you think nehru felt about gandhi? give reasons for your answer.
if anyone knows the answers to these questions and could give them to me it would be greatly appreciated because history isn't one of my strong subjects. again, you so : )

It provided unlimited drawn-out emergency actions of prolonged detention, arrest with no trial or review from the judiciary during World War II.  This was due to activities from nationalist rebels who might engage in alleged conspiracies while the war was being waged.

Many Indians saw it as an abuse of power because they can arrested without a warrant.

Harthal refers to strikes in workplaces where the workplace is closed by striking employees. Satyagraha is non-violent protest which what Gandhi used. I means insistence of the truth.

Although Nehru and Gandhi were always together there were times when they were at odds with each other.  The Salt March was one example because Nehru had doubts but when he saw the potential of it, he changed his mind.  Another was when he demanded a complete separation from the British and this was rejected by Gandhi.

president thomas jefferson hoped that the embargo act of 1807 would the united states by demonstrating to britain and france their dependence on american goods, convincing them to respect american neutrality and stop impressing american seamen. instead, the act had a devastating effect on american trade.

sorry its a lil late, but the answer is d. the rotation 180° about z'