Amajor difference between japanese samurai and european knights during the middle ages is that only knights : a. followed distinct code of honor b. wear protective armor and carried swords c. received land in payment for their services d. provided military protection for the ruling class

The correct answer is C. Received land in payment for their services.

Explanation

The Knights is a term used to refer to a set of soldiers on horseback. Particularly in the Middle Ages in Europe, the Knight was an armed institution that served the king or feudal power. They used to receive land as compensation for their service. Usually, the Knights had to respect a code of conduct. On the other hand, Samurai is a Japanese term used to refer to the military caste that provided its protection and security services to the Daimyo lords in the Japanese feudal system. These, like the European Knights, took a code of conduct; but unlike the Knights, they did not receive land in exchange for their services. So, the correct answer is C. Received land in payment for their services.

during the debate over his landmark energy policy proposal, president jimmy carter failed to consult one of the most powerful senators, louisiana’s russell long, who would have a big say over whether the legislation moved through the upper chamber. this was classic carter. with a strong distaste for congressional politics, the president simply refused to do what most other presidents would consider routine, such as courting key senators. long became so irate with the president that when he was finally invited to a white house dinner, he stood up to ask a question and, before doing so, proceeded to sarcastically introduce himself: “i’m russell long, chairman of the senate finance committee.”

this interaction is a revealing moment in stuart e. eizenstat’s fascinating new history of carter’s presidency. the former peanut farmer from georgia was a president who, according to conventional wisdom, didn’t care much for party politics; nonetheless, in eizenstat’s view, carter’s legacy on domestic and foreign policy has been vastly underappreciated. the author paints carter as a “bold and determined” leader who bravely attacked the challenges of his time. eizenstat goes so far as to argue that carter might very well be the most successful one-term president in american history.

a i belive your awser is.