Under the mass of wounds, he fell at the foot of pompey's statue. everyone wanted to seem to have had some part in the murder, and there was not one of them who failed to strike his body as it lay there, until, wounded thirty-five times, he breathed his last. background information: nicolaus of damascus wrote this account of the murder of caesar a few years after the event. although he did not directly witness the event, he did have the opportunity to interview many of the people who were there. is this a reliable source for a historian to use when writing about caesar’s death? a) no, because nicolaus was not an eyewitness to the assassination. b) no, because this account was written long after caesar’s death. c) yes, because nicolaus interviewed many of the people there. d) yes, because this account was written in the same year as caesar’s death.

The correct answer is C) Yes, because Nicolaus interviewed many of the people there.

This a reliable source for a historian to use when writing about Caesar’s death because Nicolaus interviewed many of the people there.

Although it is not a hundred percent bulletproof reliable story, it can be considered reliable in that Damascus wrote it using testimonies of people that witnessed the incident. Let's remember that a primary source is the one that directly witnessed the event. It could be a journal, a letter, a photograph of people that were there. But secondary sources are also valid when the research is done properly and the sources are serious and double-checked.

isolationism is a doctrine practiced by the united states for much of its history with the aim of not intervening in external affairs that did not pose a real threat to their country. the united states managed to maintain a state of political isolation throughout the nineteenth century and the first part of the xx. few nations have been able to maintain such a position for such a long period of time. historians argue that it is largely due to geographical reasons, given the physical distance between europe and the usa. uu the venataja of this situation is that the national state can spend its resources in satisfying all the needs of its inhabitants, without the need to invest in armament and equipment for a war that does not directly affect the country.

internationalism is a political and cultural movement that advocates for greater political and economic cooperation among nations for mutual benefit. this novimiento was transformed over time, today it includes military intervention in international conflicts with the objective of maintaining peace. the advantage of this move is in the international contacts and the influence developed by the country that carries it forward.

between the two modes of relations between states, i prefer the first, since i believe it is of the utmost importance to satisfy the needs of citizens and work for their development and as a last option to act on the international level.

assuming that by westerners you mean americans. that they were mean and controlling and abusive to its peasants.

explanation: