The warren court’s decision about prayer in public schools outlawed all forms of prayer in public schools. silent prayers by individuals in public schools. prayers by small groups of students in public schools. official prayers in public schools.

The answer is: The Warren Court's decision about prayer in public schools outlawed official prayers in public schools.

In 1962 the Supreme Court ruled in the case Engel v. Vitali that the public schools in New York were no longer obligated to let all, or most of the students recite the 'Regents Prayer'. The ruling however did not rule out all prayers in schools because students are free to say for themselves whatever prayer they wish and the school or the government cannot punish students for  doing so. Neither can they force them to say prayers before starting the school day.

  The Warren Court's decision about prayer in public schools outlawed official prayers in public schools. It happened because official praying in public schools its considered a unconstitutional action, violating the the First Amendment  of U.S Constitution that guarantees the U.S citizens, on summary, freedom of religion, speech, press and association.

  The Engel v. Vitale (1962) case has made public the issue concerning the recommendation, made in 1951 by State Board of Regents from New York to New York's public schools with the purpose of "Statement on Moral and  Spiritual Training in Schools", that encouraged daily reciting of prayers, during the morning. Though the prayers were not mandatory and considered denominational neutral, it still violated the excerpt of the Constitution that stated "Congress should make no law respecting an establishment of religion", because official praying itself its considered a religious activity.  Thus the outcome of the case was that State officials (such as the State Board of Regents) could not compose or incite the recitation of prayers in schools.

1) the taiping rebellion was prompted from 1850-1864 and waged against the ruling of machu qing dynasty. the rebellion was caused by hong xiuquan and class differences, later leading to a radical change in social and economic structure.

3) karl marx, a believer of the principle of socialism, believed that the working class would have to free themselves from the exploitation of industrialists by establishing a radical socialist classless society where all industries and   property are owned by the state.

5) as indians revolt gained power, people found additional reasons to protest against the british rule. princely families joined the uprising due to changes to the inheritance law which made adopted children ineligible to assume the throne. this was an attempt by the british to control royal succession in the princely states that were nominally independent from the british.

then its a law the end