Should the u. s. government be allowed to temporarily take away certain civil liberties from its citizens in order to successfully defeat the terrorists who threaten us? if so, specifically, which civil liberties would you as a citizen be willing to give up? explain why the absence of these civil liberties would give the u. s. government an advantage over the terrorists. if you are unwilling to give up any civil liberties, what tools do you propose that the u. s. government use in combating terrorism while executing its responsibility to provide for the health, safety, and morals of the overall population?

idk man sorry what the f.uc.jk

in his book, the riddle of the rosetta stone, james giblin talks about how there was a young british polymath and physician named thomas young who made a lot of advances on the deciphering of the rosetta stone. he says that even though young made a lot of mistakes because he was working under false assumptions, he also made huge contributions like deciphering three out of the seven symbols (more than anyone else before him). young published his findings and continued his good work but he wasn't able to progress much further due to some unfavorable situations, he still laid the basis for many other scholars and of course for the man who has been generally known to have deciphered it, jean-françois champollion

martin luther king (1929-1968) was an activist for the african american rights, mr. king has a profile of a kind leader that built a tenacity, respect and full of hope future. he was an activist through civil disobedience and no violence pressure mechanisms. he tried to build a more egalitarian and fair society. his efforts carried a reivindication message of the civilian rights to every west corners. for that reason, he won the nobel prize in 1964.