What was a major source of disagreement between jackson's critics and its supporters during the inauguration

Hello. I do believe you are referring to disagreements about what exactly happened during Andrew Jackson's First Inauguration? If not please advise and I will correct my answer.

The Inauguration was held on March 4, 1829 at the US Capitol. There was a very large crowd of 10 thousand people, including many Jackson's supporters. After it, he went on horseback to the White House for the Reception. Both Supporters and Critics agreed that there were lots of people and that authorities lost control of the crowd and that all these people stormed the White House and caused material damage and that they only left when punch and ice creams were taken to the lawn outside to lure the crowd out.

However, they disagree about the extent of the damages and the gravity of what happened. Jackson's supporters only spoke of minor, trivial damages and focused on the positive aspects (the presence of so many Jackson's supporters and their loyalty to him) and the press also reported minor damages. Jackson's critics focused on the exact opposite: they stated that the damages were enormous and that the mob was completely out of control. One possible reason is that the crowd was made up of both Jackson's supporters and upper-class Washingtonians who disliked and feared Jackson's policies in favor of lower class Americans as well as these lower-class Americans themselves. Thus, they did have a political reason to exaggerate the damages, the size and the behavior of the crowd.

your answer is a hope this

answer:

it caused mass african migration, african populations to grow, african empires to topple, and racism against slaves to emerge.

background

early european explorers to the americas likely experienced emotions including awe at the vast "new" environment, amazement at meeting "others," the thrill of the unknown, concern for personal safety, desire for personal reward, and longing for their homeland and those left behind. written and pictorial records attributed to europeans provide the bulk of the records of these early travels. impressions of natives as well as native impressions of europeans are frequently framed in the narratives of the explorers. examination of these records indicates the cautious and curious nature of first encounters.

significance

centuries of ignorance, prejudice, and opinions lacking evidence or scholarly research have tainted traditional views of the earliest meetings between native americans (first nations in canada) and europeans. students may come to recognize how the later period of continued exploration, settlement, and interaction was influenced by these early encounters from the st. lawrence river to georgia.