Based on what you know of the situation, what arguments could be made against holding suspects without allowing for a proper trial? what argument could be made for holding suspected terrorists without formally charging them with crimes and giving them a day in us court?

A good answer should contain the following:

Possible Answers:

Arguments against

We would be violating our own legal standards by not giving these people a free and fair trial.

Offering open trials would prove to the rest of the world that we have a fair and open society.

It is morally right to give each person accused of a crime a chance to defend themselves.

Arguments for

These people are dangerous and should not be allowed in the United States

The suspects were captured in battle zones and should be treated as enemy fighters, not criminals.

Explanation:

fearing kabuki could corrupt the nation’s morals, japanese government officials

explanation:

the national morals was so the japanese and the kabuki would stop fighting

the answer is c. they believed the royal family should hold all the power.