subject
History, 22.08.2019 05:50 LouieHBK

What did roosevelt, churchill, and stalin agree to at the yalta conference?
a. they approved a plan for the soviet union to occupy germany, italy, and japan after the war.
b. they called for a conference to discuss forming a new international organization, the united nations.
c. they decided the best way to defeat japan was to launch an invasion rather than drop an atomic bomb.
d. they approved a negotiated peace with germany that would allow hitler to remain in office.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 19:30
In the decision for dred scott vs.sanford, (1857) in which a slave petitioned for his freedom in a st. louis court, on the grounds that his owner had taken him into free territory, and thus he ought no longer be regarded as possessing "slave" status, but should be regarded as a free man, the court decided as follows (excerpt): "in the circuit courts of the united states, the record must show that the case is one in which by the constitution and laws of the united states, the court had jurisdiction--and if this does not appear, and the court gives judgment either for plaintiff or defendant, it is error, and the judgment must be reversed by this court--and the parties cannot by consent waive the objection to the jurisdiction of the circuit court. a free negro of the african race, whose ancestors were brought to this country and sold as slaves, is not a 'citizen' within the meaning of the constitution of the united states. when the constitution was adopted, they were not regarded in any of the states as members of the community which constituted the state, and were not numbered among its 'people or citizen.' consequently, the special rights and immunities guarantied to citizens do not apply to them. and not being "citizens" within the meaning of the constitution, they are not entitled to sue in that character in a court of the united states, and the circuit court has not jurisdiction in such a suit. the only two clauses in the constitution which point to this race, treat them as persons whom it was morally lawful to deal in as articles of property and to hold as slaves. since the adoption of the constitution of the united states, no state can by any subsequent law make a foreigner or any other description of persons citizens of the united states, nor entitle them to the rights and privileges secured to citizens by that instrument." why does the court say that the petitioning party in this case had no right to sue for his freedom? a) because he is too young b) because he is from a different state c) because he is "of the african race" with enslaved ancestors d) because he is, properly speaking, within his owner's jurisdiction
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 23:00
Which statement describes an important outcome of the congress of vienna? a. napoleon launched his final european military campaigns. b. european states had their borders clearly defined. c. jewish people were given equal right in germanic states d. the slave trade became increasingly important to european economies.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 11:00
Aform of government in which the people rule,either directly or through elected representatives
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 14:00
100 points 53. how have developed western countries affected non-western developing nations during the modern period? explain how three political, economic, and/or cultural approaches by european and other western countries shaped the developing world over the last 250 years. use examples from your studies to support your ideas and opinions.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
What did roosevelt, churchill, and stalin agree to at the yalta conference?
a. they approved...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 17.01.2020 00:31
question
Arts, 17.01.2020 00:31
question
Mathematics, 17.01.2020 00:31
Questions on the website: 13722361