Which statement describes a major difference between the international responses to genocide in bosnia and in rwanda? (answers in the photo)

The correct answer is C). Ethnic cleansing in Bosnia led to a military response from international forces but ethnic cleansing in Rwanda did not.

The statement that describes a major difference between the international responses to genocide in Bosnia and in Rwanda is ethnic cleansing in Bosnia led to a military response from international forces but ethnic cleansing in Rwanda did not.

The genocide in Rwanda was in 1994. Members of the Hutu(majority) killed 800,000 people in a horrible ethnic cleansing against the Tutsi(minority).  

During July 11 to 13, 1995, the Bosnian Serb Army killed almost 8,000 Bosnian Muslims that were in the United Nations “safe area” of Srebrenica.  

In the case of Bosnia, it led to a military response from international forces. The U.S. and some allies sent diplomats and army personnel to implement the Dayton Accords. But the case of Rwanda was different. Rwanda was left alone, so they decided on its political future .

if the government does something the people dont like i tihnk threre would be a revolt

the two atomic bombs dropped on japan in 1945 killed and maimed hundreds of thousands of people, and their effects are still being felt today. the uranium bomb detonated over hiroshima on 6 august 1945 had an explosive yield equal to 15,000 tonnes of tnt.