How does shakespeare's portrayal of richard ii differ from the historical description of him?

Shakespeare described Richard II as a  "hunchback" with "a limp and a withered arm"

The body of the  king was unburied recently and it was proved through testing and reconstruction that he had a serious illness in his spine that made him walk bent. So Shakespeare's physical potrayal of him seems to be at least partially correct.

Shakespeare lived while Elizabeth I was the queen, she was part of the Tudor family. Richard II was of the Plantagenet family. These two families had a serious rivalry between  each other so during Shakespeare's time the  Plantagenets were perceived as evil. Shakespeare probably kept that image of Richard II to be politically correct. And through analysis of historical sources it seems that the potrayal of the king's personality differs significatively from the real king as he was not documented as so easy to surrender

for the 2 countries u can do china and america because america has a democratic government while china has a communist government.

a democracy is a government run by the people either by directly voting or indirectly by electing representatives. an oligarchy is a government run by a few or a small group of people. a democracy and oligarchy are similar because both in an oligarchy and an indirect democracy, a small group of induvial determine the laws for a large group of people they are different because in an oligarchy it is easier to control and they do not have to answer to a large number of people in the country, unlike a democracy where they do have to answer to a large number of people an county that is a democracy would be the united states. a country that is an oligarchy would be the china.

because they had ajdjdjdjdndjjs