Which statements best describes why the early united states was a confederation? a) the states approved a constitution to limit the power of the central government b) the central government consisted of a monarchy that the states overthrew c) the states all had considerable power, and a weak central government handled only certain issues d) the powerful central government allowed the states to have notable sovereignty

C) the states all had considerable power, and a weak central government handled only certain issues

Explanation:

The early United States was a confederation because it was formed by the union or alliance of sovereign and independent states that united themselves together for certain purposes (such as common defense) and that established a weak central government to handle certain issues.

Under this system of government, the states retained most of the power while the government, which consisted of a Congress only, had few powers such as the ability to declare war (although it was not authorized to draft soldiers), appoint military officers, sign treaties, make alliances, appoint foreign ambassadors, manage relations with Indians, and raise money by asking the states for funds (which had the option to reject the request), borrowing from foreign governments, or selling western lands.

the covenant that god made with abraham was a unilateral (one-sided) promise from god to abraham.   apart from anything abraham did, god was promising that he was going to bring about a great nation from abraham's offspring, and that the messiah (meaning "the anointed one") would come from abraham's descendants, as one through whom the whole world would receive favor from god.   as god promised abraham, "through your offspring all nations on earth will be blessed" (genesis 22: 18).

the "new covenant" was announced by jesus of nazareth, who had asserted that he was the "son of david" (and descendant of abraham) that fulfilled those promises to abraham.   when jesus introduced the sacred meal that we now refer to as the lord's supper, as told his disciples in reference to the wine they drank, "this cup is the new covenant in my blood, which is poured out for you" (luke 22: 20).   this "new covenant" through jesus was also a unilateral (one-sided) covenant.   he gave himself in sacrifice for all people, without conditions attached.   as his friend and apostle john later wrote, "he is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not only for ours but also for the sins of the whole world" (1 john 2: 2).

so the covenant with abraham and the "new covenant" ushered in by jesus are, in essence, connected as one covenant -- because jesus was saying he was the one promised to abraham that fulfilled that covenant and brought blessing to the world.