In what ways did the civil right movement escalate from nonviolent to more radical protest? what are the reasons for this change? which strategy do you think was best? asap. just a easy answer will be fine.

The civil rights movement was defined in its beginnings by its nonviolent approach to change. This became a defining characteristic of the movement mainly due to the involvement of Dr. Martin Luther King. Dr. King admired the approach that Mohandas Ghandi had taken to achieve the independence of India, and he wanted to replicate this approach in the United States. Many of the initial victories of the movement were due to this approach.

However, as time passed and the movement grew stronger, their strategy became more radical in some cases. This was most likely due to the fact that many people believed change to be happening in a very slow way. They wanted to achieve more meaninful change faster. This led to the escalation and radicalization of the movement.

I believe the best strategy was the nonviolent approach. The lack of violence ensured that the protesters were always seen as being on the side of the law. Therefore, it only highlighted how unfair and unjust the law was. Moreover, this approach was more likely to be appreciated by a wide range of people.

the ss was the main organization responsible for the genocidal murder of around six million people of european ethnic minorities, essentially jews, in the holocaust. the members of all its branches committed war crimes and crimes against humanity during the second world war (1939-1945). likewise, the ss were involved in commercial enterprises and exploited the inmates of the concentration camps as slave laborers.

the tortures and assassinations committed by the ss were the result of an ideology developed long before the armed conflict, this ideology was based on the racial supremacy of the germans over the rest.