Why was invading and capturing nubia was so important in egyption history

In the antiquity the territory at the moment called Nubia was very influenced by the culture of the Ancient Egypt, mainly during the epochs of apogee of Egypt, being a species of Egyptian virreinato.

For the ancient Kemet (Ancient Egypt), Nubia was "Tai-Seiti" (the land of the "people of the bow"), population hardly subjugated, because they knew how to use their bows and arrows.

Pharaohs of the New Kingdom, like Ramses II (1290-1224 BC), rose to royalty because they could prevail over the Nubians, drag them into defeat. To show his divinity, this sovereign decided to build his great temple at Abu Simbel. Ramses II built the temple of Aksha in the center of Nubia, and Viceroy Setau and his wife were represented, worshiping him, in the temple of Faras.

Nubia was divided into two large sectors, Wawat to the north (to the second Nile River cataract), and Kush to the south (between the second waterfall and the confluence of the Blue Nile and the White Nile). To the north was the Egyptian province Ta Seti ('Land of the Arc').

Kush was a region located along the valley of the Nile that included the south of the present Egypt and extended by the north of the present Sudan. It was rich in raw materials, especially gold, so the Egyptians very early sought to exploit these resources. Egyptian texts relate, from Pharaoh's time, Narmerlas expeditions to Nubia, but it was in the era of the Middle Kingdom of Egypt, when they conquered Lower Nubia (from the first to the second Nile waterfall). From Mentuhotep II the campaign was undertaken and from Sesostris I the conquest can be considered concluded.

1- in bradbury's  fahrenheit 451, all books are banned and burned upon discovery. in the nazi germany, books considered to be subversive to the regime would be burned to keep the population from generating ideologies that could challenge nazism.

2- was bradbury correct in his literal interpretation of  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.”? in some way, yes. when knowledge is not only limited, but also controlled, the people tied to it are led to their demise. just like in the novel, people in nazi germany who owned  subversive books were punished not only by the burning of their property, but also by the discrimination that followed after such a public form of consequence. if a person was seen being confiscated  subversive  books, they may be considered as an ally to the jews, which meant pretty much the same as being the enemy back then. because of the extreme exclusion and suffering that followed this punishment, it's almost like dying a slow death.

in this way, the phrase  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.” is both literal and figurative.

explanation:

mark brainliest and have a great day!