Which text is valuable for gaining context about a history bit but is unreliable as evidence which text is valuable for gaining context about a historical event but is unreliable as evidence

Hmm... your question is a bit too vague (since there were no options included) but I will answer it to the best of my ability... a secondary source is valuable for gaining context about history but is unreliable as evidence.

There are two sources I know of: primary sources and secondary sources.

A primary source is like a the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, etc. Primary sources don't have the the immediacy of the original thing.

A secondary source is like a textbook, as it was written to add to the primary source, and maybe biased.

Other possible answers to your question are: encyclopedia, anthology, historical fiction/history novel.

I hope that helps! :)

zheng he was a chinese explorer who lead seven great voyages on behalf of the chinese emperor. his seven total voyages were diplomatic, military, and trading ventures, and lasted from 1405 – 1433. however, most historians agree their main purpose was to promote the glory of ming dynasty china.

explanation:

hey there! these are the answers.

to generate donations

to organize supporters

to solicit support