How are the results of the big stick policy dollar diplomacy and moral diplomacy similar in latin america

The options of the question are, A) people in Latin America welcomed the increase in U.S. investments. B) people in Latin America worked to create democracies in their countries. C) people in Latin America were angry at U.S. actions. D) people in Latin America hoped the U.S. would continue to help their governments.

The correct answer is C) people in Latin America were angry at U.S. actions.

The results of the Big stick policy, Dollar diplomacy, and Moral diplomacy in Latin America made people in Latin America were angry at U.S. actions.  

President Theodore Roosevelt named its foreign dominant policy, “Big stick policy”. He believed in this policy was the best to apply in Latin America and the Caribbean countries. On the other hand, President William Howard Taft created the Dollar diplomacy. It generated financial aid to support a Latin American region in order to maintain and control the trade and financial interest of the U.S. But people in Latin America did not like the U.S. intervention and many rebellions and uprisings were part of the reactions to these policies. So, The results of the Big stick policy, Dollar diplomacy, and Moral diplomacy in Latin America made people in Latin America were angry at U.S. actions.  

according to the quotation from booker t. washington's 1895 atlanta compromise speech.

in the great leap from slavery to freedom . . the masses of us are to live by the production of our hands . . we shall prosper . . as we learn to dignify and glorify common labor.

washington believed that  hard work had its own kind of dignity.

explanation:

mark brainliest and have a great day!

they charge for servic mark me brainliest