Aproposed law from the federal government would force all 50 states to punish teenagers who practiced texting and driving by revoking the licenses of those who texted and drove on the first offense for a period of 2 years. what would the reaction of an anti-federalist be to this proposed law? what would cause them concern? overall in the federalist vs. anti-federalist debate, what did each side advocate for? explain in your own words and complete sentences (5-8 sentences)

The Anti Federalist would revolt against the law because the law would apply for every state overlooking their own rights, making them weaker. This last part would cause concern for them, the point that the central power is having more power than them. The Federalist support that to avoid a precarious union of states is needed a powerful central government. On the other hand, the anti-federalist said that the power of the central government must be cut off and decrease the other powers so the local governments can be independent of the central power.

for the 2 countries u can do china and america because america has a democratic government while china has a communist government.

a democracy is a government run by the people either by directly voting or indirectly by electing representatives. an oligarchy is a government run by a few or a small group of people. a democracy and oligarchy are similar because both in an oligarchy and an indirect democracy, a small group of induvial determine the laws for a large group of people they are different because in an oligarchy it is easier to control and they do not have to answer to a large number of people in the country, unlike a democracy where they do have to answer to a large number of people an county that is a democracy would be the united states. a country that is an oligarchy would be the china.