The espionage and sedition acts of 1917 called for the suppression of speech that criticized the war effort during world war i. americas were imprisoned when accused and convicted of speaking out against the war. what arguments could be made to support such a law? what arguments could be made against such a law?

FOR :

AGAINST:

 A good answer should contain the following:

Possible Answers:

  1.  In support: In a time of war dissenters could weaken the war effort. Speech that might hurt other Americans is not protected by the First Amendment

   2. Against: The first Amendment should protect even unpopular speech. Speaking out against a war doesn’t endanger other Americans. In a democracy people should be free to disagree with the governme

question is unclear.

i can't sorry.

post the full question so i can .

answer; /// the above statement is (false); the smaller states objected to the virginia plan because they would have fewer votes that the larger states;