1. was “labor violence” inevitable and unavoidable ? what factors played into causing much of the confrontation between unions and big business. 2. what were some of the different and mutual demands of the various national unions? what tactics did they employ to realize their demands? 3. when viewed from the perspective of the corporations, what do you think they were so adamant in opposing unions?

Fights and confrontations between labor unions and employers in the United States began happening since the mid 19th century as a response to the impact generated by the Industrial Revolution. One of the first unions began in the 1880s and from that moment on, they have been constant in U.S history. 1. One thing to know about labor violence in the U.S is that it could have been prevented if a) employers had answered to the needs of their workers instead of abusing them, b) if employers had worked hand in hand with unions instead of looking for constant ways to oppose them and destroy them and c) if in the effort to dissipate unions, strikebreakers and spies had not been used as a means to instigate much of the violence that ensued and that sought to muddy unions so as to seek a way to destroy them. Much of the problems that generated the strikes and favored the unions were the abuse in salaries and hours, the lack of conditions for workers, the high replacement rate of workers for cheaper labor without any consideration, among other things. 2. What unions wanted in general was an improvement of the conditions of workers, sanitary, salary and hour-wise, as well as protection against the high rotation of jobs. They wanted also to create a monopoly so that employers would not be able to replace union workers with cheaper labor from other sources. But each industry that had unions faced different demands, especially the Steel and Railroad industries, whose unions also wanted protection against the unhealthy and unsafe conditions in which they worked. The tactics that they used were the strikes and also violence against strikebreakers and guards. Sometimes, however, they would just rally peacefully and stop working altogether to force their employers hands. 3. Employers did not want unions because this meant a) that workers were organizing themselves and not just accepting their jobs, regardless of the conditions, b) because laborers were starting to demand changes in their working conditions, something that affected businesses and meant a change in their financial distribution and c) because this meant that they would be forced to select their workforce from the union and adapt to the unions´ demands if they wanted to operate normally.

my cultural heritage consists of irish, german, native american, and others.

savannahjax02 hand

one of the strengths of the united nations is their worldwide peacekeeping. they prevent conflict from escalating into war, try to reach agreements between the opposing sides, and bring war to an end as soon as possible. they also have a world food programme which is among the most effective food aid programmes worldwide. the united nations provides food and clean water to people in need, they also send money to strengthen the country's economy. the united nations also provides unaids, which is healthcare to hiv patients. they also raise funds to prevents aids/hivs and the spreads of others diseases. they also have campaigns that show how to protect from certain diseases. the united nations also has the unhcr, the united nations high commissioner for refugees, which is an aid to refugees. it them by raising funds to build up refugee camps or to improve housing and sanitary facilities. it also has many programmes to raise awareness about the refugee crisis and the needs of the refugees. the united nations high commissioner for refugees also builds schools in crisi regions and refugee camps. a major strength of the united nations is its efforts in elucidating the crisis from which it emerged. as such many of the issues which the world was confronted with in 1945 have been addressed. this can be seen with the organization’s mediatory efforts in resolving conflict in territories. intrinsically, particular reference can be observed in the cold war era 1947-1953 where the world was in a state of political and military tension between the powers of the western world led by the united states and the communist world led by the soviet union. as the world was divided east and west, capitalist and communist, us and ussr, the united nations had its first opportunities to establish its role as a mediator in the international system. moreover, the united nations was involved in the establishment of an israeli state on the eastern mediterranean coast. violence erupted between israeli forces and palestinians and their arab allies in response to the foundation of the state of israel. there has also been the promotion of democracy where the united nations has enabled people in many countries to participate in free and fair elections including those held in cambodia, namibia, el salvador and south africa. additionally, there has been the promotion of women’s rights, particularly in middle eastern countries, to have greater control over their lives. the united nations fund for women (unifem) have supported projects in improving the quality of life for women in over 100 countries including marketing opportunities, access to food production and so on.

however, despite these strengths there exist deep seated shortcomings of the organization in the contemporary world. notable of these is the fact that the world today is a different world than the epoch in which the united nations was born. at that time the issues facing the organization was the achievement of peace and security in a world of great powers, the insistence of the united states that the european powers should grant independence and self-government to their colonies and so on. nonetheless, some of these remain but many have changed. the world and its political atmosphere have undergone a massive transformation however the structures of the united nations have remain unchanged. these structures have failed to keep pace with the new demands which must be presently addressed. consequently, given these circumstances the united nations now faces increasing demand for change both in its institutions and in the subject matters of its concern. lastly, another weakness involves that of corruption and mismanagement. there have been reports of a cascade of scandals at the hands of the united nations. most notable of these is the wholesale corruption of the oil-for-food relief program in iraq, disappearance of united nations funds and the exposure of a transnational network of sexual misconduct by united nations peacekeepers in africa. to add, there have been political pressure, favoritism and cronyism plaguing appointments to united nations peace operations. as such it can be examined there exist a culture of impunity where the united nations operates with secrecy and is shielded by diplomatic immunity. consequently, it is no doubt that this result in institutional weakness and a staff that is less than ideally equipped to complete the required tasks. in essence, the united nations as an organization contains both pros and cons in its performance and functions. its strengths emphasizes its utmost importance in the international arena in terms of it neutral stance and mediator efforts however this is questionable when and examination of its weaknesses is undertaken.

word count: 769

mark brainliest