Which best describes why web dubois and booker t. washington's approaches to and strategies towards civil rights were so different? a. washington faced minimal and mild discrimination as he was raised in a prominent family in the north. dubois faced harsh discrimination, restrictions from jim crow laws, while growing up in the post-reconstructed south. b. dubois was fortunate enough to have parents who were well involved in politics, rising from smaller government positions to higher federal positions, while washington was raised by uneducated and politically excluded slave parents. c. washington was unwilling to speak out publicly, which restricted the audience he reached, thus the support he gained, while dubois spoke eloquently to small and large audiences, thus able to gain more personal and monetary support. d. dubois was born in the north, earned his doctorate from harvard, after having scholarships from other prestigious institutions, while washington was born a southern slave, and his determination allowed him to gain education and respect as a leader.

D. DuBois was born in the North, earned his doctorate from Harvard, after having scholarships from other prestigious institutions, while Washington was born a Southern slave, and his determination allowed him to gain education and respect as a leader.

Explanation:

Born into slavery in Virginia in 1856, Booker T. Washington's initial life and training did a lot to impact his later reasoning. After the Civil War he worked in a salt mine and as a local for a white family and in the long run went to the Hampton Institute, one of the principal every black school in America. In the wake of finishing his training, he started educating, and in 1881 he was chosen to head the Tuskegee Normal and Industrial Institute in Alabama, a kind of professional school that tried to give African Americans the fundamental good guidance and viable work abilities to make them effective in the prospering Industrial Revolution.  

William Edward Burghardt Du Bois was born in 1868 in Great Barrington, Massachusetts, to a free-black family in a relatively coordinated network. He went to the nearby schools and exceeded expectations in his examinations, inevitably graduating as valedictorian of his class. Nonetheless, when in 1885 he started going to Fisk University in Tennessee, he experienced out of the blue the open bias and suppression of the Jim Crow South, and the experience profoundly affected his reasoning.

Du Bois came back toward the North to promote his training, with nothing not exactly square with rights for black Americans being his definitive objective. When he earned his Ph.D from Harvard University in 1895, he was the main black man to have done as such, and his exposition, "The Suppression of the African Slave Trade to the United States of America, 1638– 1870," was one of the primary scholastic deals with the subject.

the articles of confederation only set up the continental congress at the federal level. there were no executive or judicial branches except within the states. the states were allowed to keep every right that was not specifically given to congress. the bonding of the states was through a 'firm league of friendship' that best served as a defense agreement against invasion. states were not allowed to use taxes as a way to discourage treaties, and states were extremely limited in their dealings with foreign nations.

not many historians today talk about the strengths of the articles of confederation, likely because of how unpopular the document quickly became. the articles did set the legislative body, congress, as the highest power in the nation because of the fear of monarchy. congress had the sole power to declare war, assign treaties, entertain foreign relations, and operate post offices. disputes between states and territorial issues were to be brought to congress. the document also stipulated that canada was allowed to enter the union if they desired.

there were more weaknesses than strengths under the articles of confederation. the lack of power given to the continental congress strangled the federal government. the articles gave congress the power to pass laws but no power to enforce those laws. if a state did not support a federal law, that state could simply ignore it. congress had no power to levy taxes or regulate trade. without a federal court system or executive leader, there would be no way to enforce these laws, either. amending the articles of confederation would also require a unanimous decision, which would be extremely difficult.

cherokee and arikara