subject
History, 17.10.2019 04:30 Wachsmuth132

The british empire once controlled modern-day india. while many british historians once defended great britain's right to rule over foreign colonies, british historians today largely take a negative view of such colonialism. which of the following best explains why this change in interpretation might have occurred?
a. historians today know that the point of view should not influence interpretation.
b. historians today have different biases than previous historians.
c. historians today make historical arguments rather than claims.
d. historians today understand that all evidence is equally valid.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 21:40
2points a challenge faced by general george washington at the start of the war was that: o a. his troops lacked weapons. o b. rival officers wanted his job. o c. british forces captured his home and family o d. his troops were surrounded by british forces. submit
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 22:30
The fourteenth amendment how did the action resolve a longstanding conflict in post-civil war america? it defined the process for readmittance of the former confederate states into the united states of america. it ensured the right to vote to all male citizens of the united states, regardless of race, color, or prior servitude. it defined citizenship and related rights for african americans. it abolished slavery in the united states.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 08:00
Germany’s reparation payments after world war i caused massive inflation in germany. massive deflation in germany. economic stability. increased freedom.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 11:30
The government gives public funds to low-performing schools for new computers. they decide to give more money to the lowest performers, some of which happen to promote multi denominational religions. according to the establishment clause, how would a court rule on this case? as a direct violation of the clause because government institutions cannot support religious institutions for any reason as a violation of the clause because the government gave more money to religious schools than public schools as in compliance with the clause because the government's action was for a secular purpose, did not advance a particular religion, and was unentangled as in compliance with the clause because the government gave money to fewer religious schools than public schools
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
The british empire once controlled modern-day india. while many british historians once defended gre...
Questions
question
Law, 04.12.2020 19:40
Questions on the website: 13722361