subject
History, 18.10.2019 15:00 kristenhani

18. what was a result of the french and indian war? a. the colonists learned they didn't have much in common with the british. b. the british defeated the french but the amount of land they claimed didn't grow. c. the colonists defeated the british and the french and were free. d. the french gained a lot of british land and the colonies were more pressed for land.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 19:30
In the decision for dred scott vs.sanford, (1857) in which a slave petitioned for his freedom in a st. louis court, on the grounds that his owner had taken him into free territory, and thus he ought no longer be regarded as possessing "slave" status, but should be regarded as a free man, the court decided as follows (excerpt): "in the circuit courts of the united states, the record must show that the case is one in which by the constitution and laws of the united states, the court had jurisdiction--and if this does not appear, and the court gives judgment either for plaintiff or defendant, it is error, and the judgment must be reversed by this court--and the parties cannot by consent waive the objection to the jurisdiction of the circuit court. a free negro of the african race, whose ancestors were brought to this country and sold as slaves, is not a 'citizen' within the meaning of the constitution of the united states. when the constitution was adopted, they were not regarded in any of the states as members of the community which constituted the state, and were not numbered among its 'people or citizen.' consequently, the special rights and immunities guarantied to citizens do not apply to them. and not being "citizens" within the meaning of the constitution, they are not entitled to sue in that character in a court of the united states, and the circuit court has not jurisdiction in such a suit. the only two clauses in the constitution which point to this race, treat them as persons whom it was morally lawful to deal in as articles of property and to hold as slaves. since the adoption of the constitution of the united states, no state can by any subsequent law make a foreigner or any other description of persons citizens of the united states, nor entitle them to the rights and privileges secured to citizens by that instrument." why does the court say that the petitioning party in this case had no right to sue for his freedom? a) because he is too young b) because he is from a different state c) because he is "of the african race" with enslaved ancestors d) because he is, properly speaking, within his owner's jurisdiction
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 22:00
Type the correct answer in the box what weather pattern did indian farmers depend on to bring water for their crops? indian farmers depended on the to bring water for their crops reset ne
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 03:30
"but let us admit texas, and we shall place the balance of power in the hands of the texans themselves. they, with the southern states, will control the policy and the destiny of this nation; our tariff will then be held at the will of the texan advocates of free trade. are our friends of the north prepared to deliver over this great national policy to the people of texas? " - rep. joshua giddings, ohio, may 21, 1844 this quote points to what major issue in the years leading up to the civil war?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 04:30
How did gates men react to encountering british troops at camden south carolina
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
18. what was a result of the french and indian war? a. the colonists learned they didn't have much...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 08.10.2019 10:30
question
History, 08.10.2019 10:30
question
Mathematics, 08.10.2019 10:30
Questions on the website: 13722359