Describe the differences and similarities between anti-war groups like student for a democratic society (sds) and groups that supported the government such as young americans for freedom (yaf). be brief; bullet points are acceptable.

Similarities:

The organization were founded around the same year: SDS or Students for a Democratic society was founded in 1959. Young Americans for Freedom (YAF)  was founded in 1960.

Both organizations represent college students opinion in the USA towards different government policies.

Differences:

Students for Democratic Society (SDS) had its origins in the student branch of the League for Industrial Democracy, a social democratic educational organization whereas Young Americans for Freedom (YAF) is a conservative youth activism founded as a coalition between traditional conservatives and libertarians on American college campuses.

The purposes of creation are different: SDF was operating under the principles of the “Port Huron Statement,” a manifesto written by Tom Hayden and Haber and issued in 1962, the organization grew slowly until the escalation of U.S. involvement in Vietnam (1965) wheresas the purposes of YAF are to support public policies conpatible with the Sharon Statement, which was adopted by young conservatives at a gathering at the home of William F. Buckley in Sharon, Connecticut, on September 11, 1960.

6 pounds is equivalent to 92 ounces.

hope this !

the caste system in india is the paradigmatic ethnographic example of caste. it has origins in ancient india, and was transformed by various ruling elites in medieval, early-modern, and modern india, especially the mughal empire and the british raj.it is today the basis of educational and job reservations in india.it consists of two different concepts, varna and jati, which may be regarded as different levels of analysis of this system.

the caste system as it exists today is thought to be the result of developments during the collapse of the mughal era and the british colonial regime in india. the collapse of the mughal era saw the rise of powerful men who associated themselves with kings, priests and ascetics, affirming the regal and martial form of the caste ideal, and it also reshaped many apparently casteless social groups into differentiated caste communities.the british raj furthered this development, making rigid caste organisation a central mechanism of administration

i didn’t fully understand your question but i hope this you !