In which situation would it be least likely for a scientist to revise her experimental methods? a. if her results support her hypothesis b. if her data do not support her hypothesis c. if no conclusions can be drawn from the data d. if results are the same after repeating the procedure

A. If her results support her hypothesis

Explanation:

Experimental methods are geared towards obtaining relevant data that supports an hypothesis.

If data collected through her experimental methods, put in place to prove her hypothesis, does not support her hypothesis, then that shall be a fail calling for revision of the experimental methods used.

If data collected supports her hypothesis then it is proven hence there shall be no use of revising the experimental methods used.

The correct answer is A) if her results support her hypothesis.

The situation that would be least likely for a scientist to revise her experimental methods is if her results support her hypothesis.

That should be the scenario because if the results match her hypothesis, it means that she is correct. When doing research, the scientific method forces scientists to repeat the experiment two, three or as many times needed in order to consider phenomena as real. That is how strict the scientific method is. The results have to be supported by numbers, statistics, and facts.

what the first or next guy says

well this is going to be a long answer lol ok so the visigoths were a branch of the goths who frequently raided rome, uh the hunas attacked the guptas a lot and weakened them, uuhm of course the romans used math and science in there every day lives i mean they had a whole empire to run, and rome was split into east and west by a general named diocletian. hope this you! : )