Part a: list one of the main conflicts between israel and egypt prior to the camp david accords that made the meeting necessary. part b(5 points): name the three leaders and the countries they represented at the camp david accords part c (5 points): why was it monumental for the leaders you named in part b to meet? part d (5 points): how have the years after the camp david accord been different than the years prior regarding relations between egypt and israel?

A.  One of the main conflicts had been the October War of 1973 -- also known as the Yom Kippur War (in Israel) and the Ramadan War (in Arab nations).  That war had been by a coalition of Arab states, led by Egypt and Syria, against Israel.  Israel had won and was occupying the Sinai peninsula.

B.  The three key leaders involved were President Jimmy Carter of the United States, Prime Minister Menachem Begin of Israel, and President Anwar Sadat of Egypt.

C. It was monumental for these leaders to meet -- especially the leaders of Israel and Egypt, because they had been in conflict with one another since the establishment of Israel in 1948.

D  The years since the Camps David Accords have seen a sustained peace agreement between Israel and Egypt -- one of the few lasting peace agreements in the Middle East.

battle of saint-mihiel, (12–16 september 1918), allied victory and the first u.s.-led offensive in world war i. the allied attack against the saint-mihiel salient provided the americans with an opportunity to use their forces on the western front en masse.

explanation:

isolationism is a doctrine practiced by the united states for much of its history with the aim of not intervening in external affairs that did not pose a real threat to their country. the united states managed to maintain a state of political isolation throughout the nineteenth century and the first part of the xx. few nations have been able to maintain such a position for such a long period of time. historians argue that it is largely due to geographical reasons, given the physical distance between europe and the usa. uu the venataja of this situation is that the national state can spend its resources in satisfying all the needs of its inhabitants, without the need to invest in armament and equipment for a war that does not directly affect the country.

internationalism is a political and cultural movement that advocates for greater political and economic cooperation among nations for mutual benefit. this novimiento was transformed over time, today it includes military intervention in international conflicts with the objective of maintaining peace. the advantage of this move is in the international contacts and the influence developed by the country that carries it forward.

between the two modes of relations between states, i prefer the first, since i believe it is of the utmost importance to satisfy the needs of citizens and work for their development and as a last option to act on the international level.