According to the passage, which of these choices would have been illegal in the late 1600s?
a) a farmer in georgia trades food goods with a shipbuilder in massachusetts.
b) a merchant in the maryland colony unloads fur from a spanish ship in exchange for corn.
c) a trader in london purchases wine directly off of a ship from the southern coast of france.
d) a planter in the virginia colony trades tobacco to a south carolina plantation owner for cotton.
eliminate

The correct answer is B) a merchant in Maryland Colony unloads fur from a Spanish ship in exchange for corn.

According to the passage, the option that would have been illegal in the late 1600s was a merchant in Maryland Colony unloads fur from a Spanish ship in exchange for corn.

The passage refers to the Navigation acts that were passed in 1651.

One of the rules of that act stated that "no goods grown or manufactured in Africa, the Americas, or Asia could be brought into England except in English vessels." So in the case of this question, the ship was from Spain and that was prohibited. Later, by 1660, another prohibition was that it forbade importing goods into or exporting goods out of the British colonies unless British ships were used in the process.

So according to the passage, the option that would have been illegal in the late 1600s was a merchant in Maryland Colony unloads fur from a Spanish ship in exchange for corn.

The Navigation Acts

The first of these was passed in 1651, with the primary rule that no goods grown or manufactured in Africa, the Americas, or Asia could be brought into England except in English vessels. Additionally, goods from any European country imported into England must be brought in British ships or in the ships of the country that produced them.

In 1660, a more infamous part of this act was passed. It forbade importing goods into or exporting goods out of the British colonies unless British ships were used in the process. Additionally, certain products such as cotton, sugar, & tobacco could not be shipped to any country except England or to another English colony.

According to the passage, which of these choices would have been ILLEGAL in the late 1600s?

A. A farmer in Georgia trades food goods with a shipbuilder in Massachusetts.

B. A merchant in the Maryland Colony unloads fur from a Spanish ship in exchange for corn.

C. A trader in London purchases wine directly off of a ship from the southern coast of France.

D. A planter in the Virginia Colony trades tobacco to a South Carolina plantation owner for cotton.

B. A merchant in the Maryland Colony unloads fur from a Spanish ship in exchange for corn.

Explanation:

if your on USA test prep correct answer is B) a merchant in Maryland colony unloads fur from a Spanish ship in exchange for corn.

& or

B is Correct because we know that the only illegal act here- for sure- is the situation where A merchant in the Maryland Colony unloads fur from a Spanish ship in exchange for corn. The passage states that goods from a foreign country- in this case Spain- must enter a colony- Maryland in this example- in order to be legal. Such laws are part of the economic theory of mercantilism. The other choices lack clarification as to the legality of the deal.

30 and 44 are b

explanation:

interdependence is when all participating groups and individuals depend on each other. if you depend on one anothers goods, you end up trading in order to get the items you're looking for. (for ex: if i have food and you have water, we trade in order to depend on each other to live)