subject
History, 31.10.2019 16:31 cobbiegirl8996

The supreme court rules by a 6 to 3 margin that andy was wrongfully discriminated against at his place of employment. the six justices who ruled in favor of andy may compile their reasoning for their decision in a) the majority opinion. b) the dissenting opinion. c) a writ of certiorari. d) an amicus curiae brief.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 16:30
What triumphs did the late 19th century witness in the realms of industrial growth, urbanization, and technological innovation? what challenges did these developments pose for urban dwellers, workers, and recent immigrants? how did city officials and everyday citizens respond to these challenges?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 02:20
Why did un coalition troops battle iraqi forces in 1991? iraq had invaded saudi arabia, along with its other border nations.iraq had invaded kuwait, which was a major source of the world's oil.the united nations wanted to remove saddam hussein from power.the united nations wanted to prevent the trade of illegal drugs.
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 07:00
What is one aspect of an interpretation of literature
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 11:00
According to us supporters, which was a benefit of purchasing alaska? the territory would be a buffer to invasions from europe. the territory would provide a place for many americans to live. it would increase trade by improving access to the northern pacific. it would increase the united states’ power by creating a bond with russia.
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
The supreme court rules by a 6 to 3 margin that andy was wrongfully discriminated against at his pla...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 09.09.2020 20:01
question
Mathematics, 09.09.2020 20:01
Questions on the website: 13722363