Which was the main reason that the united states adopted policies to stop the spread of communism around the world?
the united states wanted to expand its territory around the soviet union.
the united states wanted to keep its prendrred trading status with most of the countries around the world.
he united states feared that communism would eventually take over its own government.
ne united states believed the soviet union's communist ideology was dangerous and undemocratic.

The correct answer is D) The United States believed the Soviet Union's communist ideology was dangerous and undemocratic.

The main reason that the United States adopted policies to stop the spread of communism around the world was because the United States believed the Soviet Union's communist ideology was dangerous and undemocratic.

After World War II, the Soviet Union controlled many Eastern Europe countries in which it imposed Communism. That was the case of East Germany, Poland, Hungary, and Romania. The Soviet Union influence China, North Vietnam, North Korea, and Cuba, in the Caribbean. That is why during the Cold War years the United Sates did the impossible to stop the spread of Communism. The US supported South Korea in the Koran War and South Vietnam in the Vietnam War.

well it definitly does because if you are seen as weak you will be seen as unimportant and they will walk all over you and the us is the most powerful military and the largest in the world

hope this

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is