Which two details would be best to include in a discussion of military regimes in myanmar and indonesia? select all that apply. construction of petronas towers house arrest of aung san suu kyi seizure of east timor revolutionary reforms of ferdinand marcos election of corazon aquino

- house arrest of Aung San Suu Kyi

- seizure of East Timor

Explanation:

Myanmar and Indonesia have both been ruled by military regimes for quite a while now. In Myanmar the military regime did not allowed the elected president of the country Aung San Suu Kyi to be in office, but instead they occupied the government offices and continued to rule, while their political opponent was sent in home prison for over a decade. Indonesia on the other hand has had an expansionist politics, and it is weird how the international community hasn't reacted to it, especially because the country managed to break every single human right. One of the invaded territories is Timor, occupying half of the island, the western one, persecuting people, murdering on ethnic and religious base, exploiting the resources.

the answer to this question is the third option. hope this

this is a good question! i'll do some research and come back when i have the answer!