our world is interconnected today in a way that it never has been before. one of the many strands that connect us is the internet. the internet is one of the most groundbreaking technological discoveries of all time. do you believe the internet is a positive thing, a negative thing, or something in the middle? make sure to use at least 2 sentences in your answer.

I think that the internet is something in the middle. It can be used as good or bad.

See, my ideology is that every coin has two sides. Similarly I feel that internet is a neutral thing, it becomes positive or negative depending on our usage. But I guess we can say that internet is a positive thing as it has led to a lot of developments.

i believe it is capitalists.  

separation of powers, therefore, refers to the division of government responsibilities into distinct branches to limit any one branch from exercising the core functions of another.   the intent is to prevent the concentration of power and provide for checks and balances.  

the traditional characterizations of the powers of the branches of american government are:

* the legislative branch is responsible for enacting the laws of the state and appropriating the money necessary to operate the government.

* the executive branch is responsible for implementing and administering the public policy enacted and funded by the legislative branch.

* the judicial branch is responsible for interpreting the constitution and laws and applying their interpretations to controversies brought before it.

forty state constitutions specify that government be divided into three branches:   legislative, executive and judicial.   california illustrates this approach; "the powers of state government are legislative, executive, and judicial.   persons charged with the exercise of one power may not exercise either of the others except as permitted by this constitution."

while separation of powers is key to the workings of american government, no democratic system exists with an absolute separation of powers or an absolute lack of separation of powers. governmental powers and responsibilities intentionally overlap; they are too complex and interrelated to be neatly compartmentalized. as a result, there is an inherent measure of competition and conflict

minnesota:   minnesota house research,   separation of powers: when statutes and court rules conflict, 2005