It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. how does this excerpt summarize the case? it explains why the supreme court ruled in favor of william marbury in the case of marbury v. madison. it explains that the supreme court should decide whether a law or action is constitutional. it explains why the judicial department ruled that the judiciary act of 1789 was constitutional. it explains that the judicial department has powers that go beyond the limits of the constitution.

excuse me, so what the hell is the

states

explanation:

as the old saying goes, all politics are local. state and federal governments affect our daily lives in numerous ways. yet, in our federal system, there is supposed to be a balance between federal and state power. as james madison envisioned it in federalist no. 51, “the power surrendered by the people” would be “divided between two distinct governments,” creating a balance of power that would enable the “different governments [to] control each other.”

c. is the western hemisphere.