Few rights are more critical to a well-functioning democratic system then free speech. consider the difference between the supreme court's statement in schenk v u. s. (1919) the government has the power to punish speech that poses "a clear and present danger" to the functioning of the government and its statement in texas v. johnson (1989) that "government may not prohibit expression simply because it disagrees with its message." how did the court's position on speech evolve in the 70 years between these two cases?

d

explanation:

the committees of correspondence were the american colonies’ means for maintaining communication lines in the years before the revolutionary war. in 1764, boston formed the earliest committee of correspondence to encourage opposition to britain’s stiffening of customs enforcement and prohibition of american paper money. the following year, new york formed a similar committee to keep the other colonies notified of its actions in resisting the stamp act. in 1773, the virginia house of burgesses proposed that each colonial legislature appoint a committee for intercolonial correspondence. the exchanges that followed built solidarity during the turbulent times and bring about the formation of the first continental congress in 1774.

as the person below or above me i agree   the tone of voice of the itnerview can very well influecne he or she to pick one more over that   the infleuncer would pick

discrimination! they faced a lot of racism