In worcester v. georgia (1832), the state of georgia wanted to remove cherokees from within its borders and began to annex cherokee land. how did the court rule? a. only the federal government had the authority to deal with the cherokees and the georgia laws dealing with them were unconstitutional. b. the georgia laws in the case were upheld as constitutional. c. the federal government and the state of georgia both had the authority to deal with the cherokees. d. the state of georgia did not have the authority to deal with the cherokees; the true authority belonged to the state of alabama.
Answers: 3
History, 21.06.2019 19:10
Historians are concerned with the accuracy of their writings and readings but are also aware of the inability of authors to know every angle of every story biases, perspectives, beliefs, and a variety of other differences history being told by one person at a time no one being totally accurate, as hard as we try really need on this, and you^^
Answers: 2
History, 21.06.2019 22:30
Which best describes how president kennedy apples to the audiences at the beginning of his speech?
Answers: 1
History, 22.06.2019 02:30
Write three paragraphs on why the us should not have annexed the philippines
Answers: 2
History, 22.06.2019 04:00
What something thats on the news, and is going on currently?
Answers: 1
In worcester v. georgia (1832), the state of georgia wanted to remove cherokees from within its bord...
Mathematics, 26.02.2022 22:30
SAT, 26.02.2022 22:30
Mathematics, 26.02.2022 22:30
Business, 26.02.2022 22:40
Mathematics, 26.02.2022 22:40
Chemistry, 26.02.2022 22:40
Mathematics, 26.02.2022 22:40
History, 26.02.2022 22:40
Chemistry, 26.02.2022 22:40