Consider the differences between the thirteenth and fourteenth amendments. what does the fourteenth amendment do that the thirteenth does not?

The 13th Amendment officially abolishes and continues to prohibit slavery in the US. The 14th Amendment declares all persons born or naturalized in the US American citizens including African Americans.

The 13th Amendment was passed on Senate April 8th 1864. The 14th Amendment was ratified July 9th 1868.

The main difference between both Amendments is that the 14th Amendment considers ex slave citizens, which the 13th Amendment does not do. This means that ex-slaves and African Americans hold rights of citizenship, things that the abolishment of slavery did not give them.

This is why the 14th Amendment was very contested by Southern States, because of that many decisions were held by the US Supreme Court.

the fourteenth amendment did a equality under the law for all citizens,citizenship for African American, and a guarantee of due process of law.

Explanation:

i hope it help!

imma say false because i dont know anything about this.

1. the group that formally abolished the monarchy was the roundheads. after the monarchy was abolished, the english commonwealth was created. it was led by oliver cromwell, who later took the title lord protector. this leader was a puritan, meaning that he supported removing catholic rituals from the church of england.

2. identify a central idea in the bill of rights.

a.   the monarch could only exercise power as stated in the law.

3. ascended the english throne as   a joint monarch after accepting   the bill of rights   mary ii

appointed catholics as government   officials and recruited them in the   army

james ii

conquered ireland and established   the commonwealth

oliver cromwell

lost a long, bloody civil war against   forces loyal to parliament

charles i

was crowned king after a period   of commonwealth rule in england

charles ii

4. identify two effects of the glorious revolution on the english monarchy.

the idea of monarchs ruling by divine right was rejected.

a limited, constitutional monarchy was established.

5. what are two ways the bill of rights opposes the idea of the divine right of kings?

it stated that the monarch's power was subject to limits set by parliament.

it abolished the role of the monarch as the head of the church of england.