Explain what you think machiavelli is saying. do you agree or disagree with him

Well, I'm not sure what passage you're talking about, but a lot of his writings reflect on the idea that the ends justify the means, which means you can kill and torture as long as you think the end result is worth it, which would make sense, since he sided with the Medici's, basically the first mob family. If you're talking about "it is better to be feared than to be loved," he's talking about your stance according to the public. I personally believe that neither of these statements are morally sound because they eerily remind me of Hitler, but to each his own.

1- in bradbury's  fahrenheit 451, all books are banned and burned upon discovery. in the nazi germany, books considered to be subversive to the regime would be burned to keep the population from generating ideologies that could challenge nazism.

2- was bradbury correct in his literal interpretation of  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.”? in some way, yes. when knowledge is not only limited, but also controlled, the people tied to it are led to their demise. just like in the novel, people in nazi germany who owned  subversive books were punished not only by the burning of their property, but also by the discrimination that followed after such a public form of consequence. if a person was seen being confiscated  subversive  books, they may be considered as an ally to the jews, which meant pretty much the same as being the enemy back then. because of the extreme exclusion and suffering that followed this punishment, it's almost like dying a slow death.

in this way, the phrase  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.” is both literal and figurative.

explanation:

mark brainliest and have a great day!

true

explanation: